Re: _ASM_ALLOW_ONLY_RAW_DISKS
- From: Seth Miller <sethmiller.sm@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Kenny Payton <k3nnyp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:29:53 -0500
Kenny,
I'm a little confused by your post. The parameter _ASM_ALLOW_ONLY_RAW_DISKS
is not required for using ASM with files on NFS mounts. The configuration
to which you are referring is not only common, but the recommended best
practice from the Oracle documentation.
Have you started any of your testing yet?
Seth Miller
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Kenny Payton <k3nnyp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Anyone running ASM on file systems? I have a number of databases on
> Netapp and some on local storage but none of them are also running ASM.
> I’ll be running some tests in the near future where I will be limited to
> NFS. I’d like to have some redundancy in my storage layer in addition to
> what the NFS solution is using on the back end. I will have access to
> multiple separate NFS arrays and was thinking about using ASM redundancy
> spanning separate NFS mounts ( from separate arrays ). This is not a
> common configuration and I’m not sure how supportable this would be
> considering you have to set a hidden parameter to enable ASM to scan
> files. I’m curious to hear if anyone is actually using this other than
> just to play around on a laptop.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kenny
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
Other related posts:
