RE: 9205/9206 RAC on Linux RHAS 3.0
- From: "Parker, Matthew" <matthewp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thump@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 02:54:52 -0800
There are some unpublished bugs relating to asynch I/O on ocfs and =
non-contigous files. It is not recommended to use asynch with ocfs on AS =
2.1 or AS 3.0 until it is fixed in the near future with a new ocfs =
version. Using it can cause corruptions.
There are always some bugs depending on what you are doing with your =
current hardware/OS/Database/Software/Human interactions.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 1:08 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 9205/9206 RAC on Linux RHAS 3.0
Are you running 9025 or 9206 on Linux RHAS 3.0 with disk_asynch_io =
enabled?
Are you running RAC?
If so, I want to please hear from you...my managment wants to get an =
idea on number of sites running on our platform with AIO.
Management is leary of the it can cause corruption and it has issues =
statem,entas that have been tosssed around in our community that I feel =
are more accurate for older versions of Linux and Oracle.
My understanding is that 9205/9206 oin RHAS 3.0 is stable and no =
significant/known bugs.
I am verifying the bug aspect and will test, but at this time I'm just =
trying to get approval to test with AIO.
Thanks
--
..
David
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
