[optimal] Re: Scanning for mac hole with Heidelberg

  • From: CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center <cpmceyelab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:00:12 -0800

More careful scanning
Tighter grid
Higher resolution
More ART

Denice Barsness, CRA, COMT, ROUB, CDOS, FOPS
Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center
CPMC Department of Ophthalmology
2100 Webster Street Suite 212
San Francisco CA 94115
(415) 600-3937   FAX (415) 600-6563

From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stuart Alfred
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:57 PM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Scanning for mac hole with Heidelberg

Spoke with one of our retina specialists today who explained how my FA showed 
proof of the mac hole, but the accompanying OCT missed it.
I recall discussion of this issue at the last scientific session, which was 
relayed to me from an attendee.  Is perhaps Duke or anyone else coming up with 
a protocol to combat this?
My typical scan (this one in question) is:  20 degree x 20 degree, 25 line @ 15 
ART, High Speed, Eye length Medium.

--
Stuart Alfred, CRA, OCT-*C*
*
cell 317 517-9455
528 N. Bauman St.
Indianapolis, IN 46214-3618
*

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. optimal
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2014