[optimal] Re: From Denice re Marmor Protocol Plaquenil Screening

  • From: "Curtis, Rhonda" <Curtis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:01:24 +0000

I totally agree with you about the fatigue factor – not only do the patients 
zone out – the examiner’s do to!!  Obviously, we will do what is best for the 
patient, but hopefully the best is not the full threshold 10-2.

Rhonda

From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Dave's Personal Email
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 3:20 PM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Re: From Denice re Marmor Protocol Plaquenil Screening

15 years ago we were told to use a red dot stimuli. My how times have changed. 
It seems to me that a full threshold maybe excessive and inaccurate. Patient 
reliability tends to trail off on the longer threshold tests. Has there been 
any macula VF studies on plaquenil patients?  I'm curious to see if it really 
matters. I also thought plaquenil is more macula toxic than anywhere else in 
the eye. I'm not trying to create controversy, I'm just curious.
Warm Regards,

David Clark, COA
Territory Manager / US Dealer Partners

Topcon Medical Systems
111 Bauer Drive
Oakland, NJ 07436

Dclark@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Dclark@xxxxxxxxxx>
Customer service 866-922-6278
Cell: 551-579-1062

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 10, 2013, at 4:12 PM, "Curtis, Rhonda" 
<Curtis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Curtis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Bless you for all the techs out there who have ever done a full threshold 10-2.

Rhonda

From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic 
Center
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 3:06 PM
To: 'optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>'
Subject: [optimal] Re: From Denice re Marmor Protocol Plaquenil Screening

Rhonda

See small print in Ryan’s message.  10-2 SITA Standard  About 4 minutes

Denice Barsness, CRA, COMT, ROUB, CDOS, FOPS
Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center
CPMC Department of Ophthalmology
2100 Webster Street Suite 212
San Francisco CA 94115
(415) 600-3937   FAX (415) 600-6563

From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Curtis, Rhonda
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 12:59 PM
To: 'optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>'
Subject: [optimal] Re: From Denice re Marmor Protocol Plaquenil Screening

Please, please be a white target used with a standard program – it takes 
FOREVER to do the full threshold testing.

Rhonda

From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic 
Center
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 2:37 PM
To: 'optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>'
Cc: Soboleva, Marina
Subject: [optimal] From Denice re Marmor Protocol Plaquenil Screening

Can’t argue with that final weigh in.!!!  Thanks Ryan, Thanks Optimal!

Ryan, off optimal, can you contact me?  I’d like your eMail and to chat.

Thanks

Denice Barsness, CRA, COMT, ROUB, CDOS, FOPS
Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center
CPMC Department of Ophthalmology
2100 Webster Street Suite 212
San Francisco CA 94115
(415) 600-3937   FAX (415) 600-6563

From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nelson, Ryan
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:16 AM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [optimal] Re: From Denice re Marmor Protocol Plaquenil Screening

All,

I spoke with Dr. Marmor earlier this morning.  He stated he uses the WHITE 
target, 10-2 SITA with the Pattern Deviation Plot.  Hope this helps.


<image001.jpg>



From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael R. Turano, Jr.
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 7:34 AM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [optimal] Re: From Denice re Marmor Protocol Plaquenil Screening

10-2 white is what the AAO paper states.



Mike
__

Michael Turano

c. 917.826.9506
f.  917.591.1841
e. turano@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:turano@xxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:16 PM, CPMC Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center 
<cpmceyelab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpmceyelab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
The Marmor protocols for Plaquenil screening

© 2011 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology ISSN 0161-6420/11/$–see front 
matter 415
Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.11.017



Do not indicate if 10-2 VF should be white or red target.  Does anyone out 
there know for sure?


Denice

Denice Barsness, CRA, COMT, ROUB, CDOS, FOPS
Ophthalmic Diagnostic Center
CPMC Department of Ophthalmology
2100 Webster Street Suite 212
San Francisco CA 94115
(415) 600-3937<tel:%28415%29%20600-3937>   FAX (415) 
600-6563<tel:%28415%29%20600-6563>



The materials in this email are private and may contain Protected Health 
Information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action 
in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via 
telephone or return email.


Other related posts: