[opendtv] Re: Video on Demand: It's Actually Not Television's Enemy

  • From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 21:50:43 +0000

Monty Solomon posted:

-----------------
Video on Demand: It's Actually Not Television's Enemy

By Bilge Ebiri
April 07, 2014
Businessweek

To some, video on demand may still feel like a new, revolutionary 
technology that's going to change the future of TV and movies. But a 
new study shows something surprising: VOD viewership may be slowing 
down. When it comes to content, what's old is new again.

In its annual State of VOD report, released on Tuesday, the metrics 
company Rentrak - which provides real-time data on box office, 
home video, digital video, and VOD to the entertainment 
industry-reveals that in 2013 viewers spent an average of 8.7 hours 
with VOD content per month, up only a modest 12 minutes from a year 
earlier. Transactional revenue for the year was $1.5 billion, down 
about 6 percent from in 2012. Content categories that were once 
drivers of VOD growth, such as kids programming, movies, and music, 
were all down.

...

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-04-07/video-on-demand-actually-not-televisions-enemy
------------------

Perhaps what's down is pay-TV? But Monty didn't post some significant finding:

"But there was one interesting growth area: broadcast TV content. The report 
shows that the total time spent viewing on-demand broadcast prime-time content 
grew to a billion transactions, up 23 percent from 2012. 'Remember, 
fast-forwarding is disabled on broadcast prime-time shows on demand,' says 
Rentrak Chief Executive Officer Bill Livek. 'So, to discover something on the 
VOD platform, someone who actually wants to watch a show has to sit through the 
commercials-and this shows that they are willing to make that trade-off for the 
convenience.'"

Nothing to sneeze at, 23 percent gain, eh?

As one who has been doing this regularly for several years, I can say that now, 
when I watch real-time broadcast prime time shows, the ad breaks are 
excrutiatingly long. This should be a hint, in case it isn't drop-dead obvious, 
that you get dimishing returns with excrutatingly long ad breaks.

I wish that such obvious effects were not lost on the TV execs, as they seem to 
be. It should be drop-dead obvious that subjecting viewers to multiple minutes 
of ad breaks will simply make these viewers either record the show and 
fast-forward the ads, or quit watching. Why is this hard to understand?

Online TV prime time shows, with ~2 minute ad breaks, are tolerable. Start 
overloading those ads, and you'll see viewers taking action.

Bert

 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: