Music sharing doesn't kill CD sales, study says March 31, 2004 12:00am Source: CNET Networks, Inc. 2004-03-29, CNET Networks: A study of=20 file-sharing's effects on music sales says online=20 music trading appears to have had little part in=20 the recent slide in CD sales. =46or the study, released Monday, researchers at=20 Harvard University and the University of North=20 Carolina tracked music downloads over 17 weeks in=20 2002, matching data on file transfers with actual=20 market performance of the songs and albums being=20 downloaded. Even high levels of file-swapping=20 seemed to translate into an effect on album sales=20 that was "statistically indistinguishable from=20 zero," they wrote. "We find that file sharing has only had a limited=20 effect on record sales," the study's authors=20 wrote. "While downloads occur on a vast scale,=20 most users are likely individuals who would not=20 have bought the album even in the absence of file=20 sharing." The study, the most detailed economic modeling=20 survey to use data obtained directly from=20 file-sharing networks, is sure to rekindle=20 debates over the effects of widely used software=20 such as Kazaa or Morpheus on an ailing record=20 business. Big record labels have seen their sales slide=20 precipitously in the past several years, and have=20 blamed the falling revenue in large part on=20 rampant free music downloads online. Others have=20 pointed to additional factors, such as lower=20 household spending during the recession, and=20 increased competition from other entertainment=20 forms such as DVDs and video games, each of which=20 have grown over the same time period. Executives at file-sharing companies welcomed the=20 survey, saying it should help persuade reluctant=20 record company executives to use peer-to-peer=20 networks as distribution channels for music The study, performed by Harvard Business School=20 associate professor Felix Oberholzer and=20 University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill=20 associate professor Koleman Strumpf, used logs=20 from two OpenNap servers in late 2002 to observe=20 about 1.75 million downloads over their 17 week=20 sample period. That sample revealed interesting behavioral, as=20 well as economic, data. Researchers found that=20 the average user logged in only twice during that=20 period, downloading about 17 songs. Some people=20 vastly overshot that average, however--one user=20 apparently logged in 71 times, downloading more=20 than 5,000 songs. The two professors narrowed their sample base by=20 choosing a random sample of 500 albums from the=20 sales charts of various music genres, and then=20 compared the sales of these albums to the number=20 of associated downloads. Even in the most pessimistic version of their=20 model, they found that it would take about 5,000=20 downloads to displace sales of just one physical=20 CD, the authors wrote. Despite the huge scale of=20 downloading worldwide, that would be only a tiny=20 contribution to the overall slide in album sales=20 over the past several years, they said. Moreover, their data seemed to show that=20 downloads could even have a slight positive=20 effect on the sales of the top albums, the=20 researchers said. The study is unlikely to be the last word on the=20 issue. Previous studies have been released=20 showing that file sharing had both positive and=20 negative effects on music sales. The Recording Industry Association of America was=20 quick to dismiss the results as inconsistent with=20 earlier findings. "Countless well-respected groups and analysts,=20 including Edison Research, Forrester, and the=20 University of Texas, among others, have all=20 determined that illegal file sharing has adversely impacted=20 the sales of CDs," RIAA spokeswoman Amy Weiss=20 said in a statement. "Our own surveys show that=20 those who are downloading more are buying less."=20 =2Eend (paragraph)<<CNET Networks -- 03/29/04>> << Copyright =A92004 CNET Networks, Inc. >>