Two articles about a "malaise" in mobile TV. I think the most obvious is being missed: assuming it is convenient to watch video while on the move, which in certain limited circumstances it might be, e.g. on public transportation, mobile video devices that are convenient to carry have tiny screens. Tiny screens are no fun. A fellow bus rider on my route carries along a Mac laptop regularly. That screen would in principle be big enough for mobile video. But what a cumbersom nuisance it is to watch. They mention what I consider secondary causes for the slow uptake, like loud conversations around you, as if those would not equally hamper mobile audio. Yet, mobile audio works fine. Earphones usually take care of loud conversations, and they would work for mobile video too. This all sounds like the same cycle we undured with the overly-hyped interactive TV of a few years ago. So much hype, and the hype takes on a life of its own. You hear about these things so much before they even prove themselves that you start believing they already succeded. Bert ---------------------------------------------- Consumers lukewarm on mobile TV David Benjamin (02/12/2007 6:23 PM EST) URL: http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197005486 BARCELONA, Spain - The Chief Marketing Officers Council (CMO), in a Monday (Feb. 12) forum at the 3GSM World Congress provided a snapshot of both the potential and difficulties facing the annual trade show's current pet technology: mobile television. The biggest issue is that global market penetration for mobile TV stands at only 7 percent. That level of popularity places mobile TV in next-to-last place among all existing mobile services, behind gambling (8 percent) but ahead of the cellar dweller, video-sharing (4 percent). Perhaps worse news for mobile TV came from David Willan, chairman of Circle Research in the U.K., who cited a recent survey by saying, "Mobile TV has currently relative low usage and what I would call average potential." By contrast, Willan noted that three of the four most popular mobile services currently available to cellphone subscribers-SMS, MMA and SMS/MMS alerts-involve text-messaging. Some 81 percent of all users surveyed said they use SMS. Another 40 percent use MMS services and 35 percent SMS/MMS alerts. The second commonest service, at 56 percent, is content downloads. According to Willan, the strongest future potential in mobile services, beyond texting, is for e-mail, following by IMS and Web-browsing. In the area of future potential, Mobile TV doesn't crack the Top Ten, coming in eleventh behind gambling. Counseling caution, Willan said, "Let's not forget the experience of other new technologies that have failed in the past&#!51;and I'm thinking specifically about WAP phones." Offering a counterpoint to Willan's lukewarm outlook, Roy Bedlow, vice president and general manager of Palm EMEA, suggested that solving ease-of-use problems for consumers can dramatically alter the potential for new technology wrinkles like mobile TV. He offered the example of wireless e-mail, which is available on 62 percent of current mobile devices but which is only used by 15 percent of subscribers. Bedlow said the Palm Treo has simplified the e-mail function to a single click, resulting in a three-fold expansion of usage. "We have to ensure," he concluded, "that we can provide a richer user experience without increased user effort." Indeed, this might have been the theme of the mobile TV forum, during which CMO Vice President Brian Regan previewed a forthcoming CMO survey of some 15,000 mobile service early adaptors in 40 countries. Calling this study "the broadest look yet into the psychographics of the consumer," Regan detailed the "buttons" marketers can push, as well as the "pain points, irritants and aggravations" consumers suffer at the hands of service providers device manufacturers and retailers. Among the familiar complaints were cost of service, insensitive retailers who know little about products, "upsell" aggressively and then ignore post-sale service, short battery life, loud conversations by other users and the tendency of mobile devices to disconnect abruptly. Regan emphasized, above all, that before service providers rush into areas like mobile TV, they need to assure that consumers are more comfortable and "secure" in the basic services they already use-or don't use. On the cost issue, Willan offered survey data that users much prefer a monthly charge over pay-per-view. He added that the optimum monthly charge would be 10.60 euros, (about $13.80), and that consumers would have the most tolerance for a five-minute pay-per-view charge of one euro ($1.30). Both Willan and Regan offered one firm caveat to their overall findings. The data doesn't apply equally everywhere. "There are significant country-to-country differences," said Willan, "in terms of usage, in terms of different programming choices." This even applies, added Regan, to users' pet peeves. In most countries, "other people's loud conversations" are not regarded as especially troublesome, he said, "except in the United States." All material on this site Copyright 2007 CMP Media LLC. All rights reserved. ------------------------------------------ ST delays mobile TV project Junko Yoshida (02/13/2007 10:10 AM EST) URL: http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197005652 BARCELONA, Spain - STMicroelectronics disclosed Tuesday (Feb. 13) that it will delay development of its DVB-Handheld mobile TV chip. Describing the current mobile TV market as "still uncertain," ST executives declined to predict when in the future its mobile TV chip solutions might be ready. ST promised a year ago at the 3GSM World Congress here that its DVB-H-based chip would be ready by the beginning of 2007. Asked about the delay, Leon Cloetens, group vice president and general manager of ST's connectivity division, said it has instead been focusing on products such as Bluetooth/FM radio/WLAN combinations. He insisted, however, that it's not abandoning the project. "This [mobile TV] is still the market we want to play," said Cloetens. Further defending the DVB-H delay, he said the fragmentation of mobile TV market-both in terms of standards and markets-is "causing the delay of the mobile TV market as a whole," thereby justifying the company's move. Even here in Europe, DVB-H is still in the embryonic stage. Will Strauss, president of market researcher Forward Concepts, (Tempe, Ariz.) noted: "The mobile TV market will start this year [and] ST has got to get in line." By the time ST enters the market, it's likely that competitors will have completed work on a multi-standard mobile TV chip, which represents a step beyond the single-standard DVB-H chip currently gathering dust on ST's drawing board. Qualcomm, for one, is working on what the company claims the Universal Broadcast Modem chip, that supports MediaFLO, DVB-H and terrestrial ISDB-T. All material on this site Copyright 2007 CMP Media LLC. All rights reserved. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.