[opendtv] Re: Fw: [Mp4-tech] Which Codec implementation is better [ software basedor Hardware Based ]

  • From: "Ralph P. Manfredo" <rmanfredo@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:48:58 -0800

I agree 

Ralph

Ralph P. Manfredo
President and CEO

rmanfredo@xxxxxxxx

************************************************************************
BroadBand Networks Corporation
2530 Berryessa Road, No. 237
San Jose, CA 95050

Phone:  408.988.2060
Fax:      408.988.2188
Cell:      559.289.2669

www.bbnc.com

Leaders in MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 video over ATM and IP Networks
************************************************************************


-----Original Message-----
From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Keith Jack
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:49 AM
To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [opendtv] Re: Fw: [Mp4-tech] Which Codec implementation is better [
software basedor Hardware Based ]


If you're doing on it on a chip, then changing video codecs can be simply
loading new microcode from DRAM after saving a few values. No OS or HDD
dependencies involved.

BTW, if you use more than 50% of your CPU/DSP today to handle A/V decoding,
you'll likely run out of CPU cycles next year. Market requirements are
changing fast.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ralph P. Manfredo
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:59 AM
> To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [opendtv] Re: Fw: [Mp4-tech] Which Codec implementation is 
> better [ software basedor Hardware Based ]
> 
> Hi  Shanmugam T:
> 
> While that is true, A/V sync is more difficult using software and 
> requires a dedicated CPU or a high performance CPU and/or both if you 
> want to do anything other than decode a TV program.  Also, if changing 
> to a program that is compressed using a different algorithm, such as 
> from MPEG-4 to MPEG-2, unless the software is very complex, a new 
> decoder will have to be loaded and started, which will take a little 
> time based on the OS, hard disk performance, etc.  We have done some 
> significant tests and a software decoder has never beat a hardware 
> decoder in performance in both video quality, A/V sync and in speed of 
> coming on line.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Ralph
> 
> Ralph P. Manfredo
> President and CEO
> 
> rmanfredo@xxxxxxxx
> 
> **************************************************************
> **********
> BroadBand Networks Corporation
> 2530 Berryessa Road, No. 237
> San Jose, CA 95050
> 
> Phone:  408.988.2060
> Fax:      408.988.2188
> Cell:      559.289.2669
> 
> www.bbnc.com
> 
> Leaders in MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 video over ATM and IP Networks
> **************************************************************
> **********
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Donald Koeleman
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 5:07 AM
> To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [opendtv] Fw: [Mp4-tech] Which Codec implementation is better 
> [ software basedor Hardware Based ]
> 
> >From the mp4 tech list:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shanmugam T" <Shanmugam.T@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Prashant Desai" <prashant.desai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <mp4-tech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <mp4-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 5:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [Mp4-tech] Which Codec implementation is better [ 
> software basedor Hardware Based ]
> 
> 
> > Hi Prashant,
> >
> >    Software based codec has following advantages,
> >         i)  Code can be ported across many platforms
> without any change or
> > with minor modifications if required. It gives better
> re-usability and
> > time-to-market
> >         ii) General DSP or RISC processor in a system, can
> be used for
> > other codecs (audio etc) also.
> >         iii) Software updating will be easier than hardware
> modification.
> >
> >
> >  Please correct me if my understanding is wrong!
> >
> > Regards
> > Shanmugam T
> >
> >
> >
> > Prashant Desai <prashant.desai@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: 
> > mp4-tech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 08/02/2005 04:54 PM
> >
> >
> >         To:     mp4-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >         cc:
> >         Subject:        [Mp4-tech] Which Codec 
> implementation is better
> [ software based or
> > Hardware Based ]
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello All
> >
> >   i am new to this digital content would , i would like to know and 
> > understand the Pros/Cons of different methods of
> implementation of the
> > MPEG -4 , MPEG-2 decoder is better compared to the other .
> 
> 
>  
>  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
> 
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
> FreeLists.org
> 
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
> 
> - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
> FreeLists.org
> 
> - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
> unsubscribe in the subject line.
> 
> 


 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.



 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: