I agree Ralph Ralph P. Manfredo President and CEO rmanfredo@xxxxxxxx ************************************************************************ BroadBand Networks Corporation 2530 Berryessa Road, No. 237 San Jose, CA 95050 Phone: 408.988.2060 Fax: 408.988.2188 Cell: 559.289.2669 www.bbnc.com Leaders in MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 video over ATM and IP Networks ************************************************************************ -----Original Message----- From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keith Jack Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:49 AM To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [opendtv] Re: Fw: [Mp4-tech] Which Codec implementation is better [ software basedor Hardware Based ] If you're doing on it on a chip, then changing video codecs can be simply loading new microcode from DRAM after saving a few values. No OS or HDD dependencies involved. BTW, if you use more than 50% of your CPU/DSP today to handle A/V decoding, you'll likely run out of CPU cycles next year. Market requirements are changing fast. > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ralph P. Manfredo > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 10:59 AM > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Re: Fw: [Mp4-tech] Which Codec implementation is > better [ software basedor Hardware Based ] > > Hi Shanmugam T: > > While that is true, A/V sync is more difficult using software and > requires a dedicated CPU or a high performance CPU and/or both if you > want to do anything other than decode a TV program. Also, if changing > to a program that is compressed using a different algorithm, such as > from MPEG-4 to MPEG-2, unless the software is very complex, a new > decoder will have to be loaded and started, which will take a little > time based on the OS, hard disk performance, etc. We have done some > significant tests and a software decoder has never beat a hardware > decoder in performance in both video quality, A/V sync and in speed of > coming on line. > > Regards, > > Ralph > > Ralph P. Manfredo > President and CEO > > rmanfredo@xxxxxxxx > > ************************************************************** > ********** > BroadBand Networks Corporation > 2530 Berryessa Road, No. 237 > San Jose, CA 95050 > > Phone: 408.988.2060 > Fax: 408.988.2188 > Cell: 559.289.2669 > > www.bbnc.com > > Leaders in MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 video over ATM and IP Networks > ************************************************************** > ********** > > > -----Original Message----- > From: opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:opendtv-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Donald Koeleman > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 5:07 AM > To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [opendtv] Fw: [Mp4-tech] Which Codec implementation is better > [ software basedor Hardware Based ] > > >From the mp4 tech list: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Shanmugam T" <Shanmugam.T@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Prashant Desai" <prashant.desai@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: <mp4-tech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <mp4-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 5:24 AM > Subject: Re: [Mp4-tech] Which Codec implementation is better [ > software basedor Hardware Based ] > > > > Hi Prashant, > > > > Software based codec has following advantages, > > i) Code can be ported across many platforms > without any change or > > with minor modifications if required. It gives better > re-usability and > > time-to-market > > ii) General DSP or RISC processor in a system, can > be used for > > other codecs (audio etc) also. > > iii) Software updating will be easier than hardware > modification. > > > > > > Please correct me if my understanding is wrong! > > > > Regards > > Shanmugam T > > > > > > > > Prashant Desai <prashant.desai@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: > > mp4-tech-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > 08/02/2005 04:54 PM > > > > > > To: mp4-tech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > cc: > > Subject: [Mp4-tech] Which Codec > implementation is better > [ software based or > > Hardware Based ] > > > > > > > > Hello All > > > > i am new to this digital content would , i would like to know and > > understand the Pros/Cons of different methods of > implementation of the > > MPEG -4 , MPEG-2 decoder is better compared to the other . > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.