[opendtv] Re: FW: USDTV Lands in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

  • From: Craig Birkmaier <craig@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:37:36 -0400

At 12:14 PM -0400 7/12/06, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
>The point is, IMO, USDTV is the one trying to compete against cable
>here, not the broadcasters. USDTV, to an OTA broadcaster, is not a whole
>lot different from a cable system. USDTV does rent a piece of the
>broadcasters' transmission infractructure, unlike cable and DBS, but
>USDTV installs their own reception systems at customer premises, just
>like cable. And USDTV acquires broadcaster content, just like cable.

The problem, as we have discussed many times is that to compete 
effectively with cable you need to offer virtually the same content, 
at least in the extended basic tier. This is nearly impossible in 
most markets due to the limited amount of spectrum available, which 
is further reduced by the need to use in excess of 10 Mbps for the 
primary network when it is delivering HD programming.

To compete effectively with cable, broadcasters will need to:

1.  Pool ALL of their spectrum and develop the marketing, customer 
service and billing infrastructure to compete;
2.  Use the spectrum they have much more efficiently - aka single 
frequency networks that allow improved spectrum re-use in adjacent 
markets;
3. And develop a platform that incorporates PVR capabilities to push 
non time critical content.


>My take on this is that broadcasters aren't the ones killing USDTV, in
>spite of the CEO's assertion. My take on this is that USDTV is no
>different from Quiero or from ONdigital/ITV. People who want to
>subscribe to any sort of TV service prefer to go straight to cable or
>DBS, where they can begin with something cheap, maybe, but have lots of
>growing power.

You're on the right track here Bert. People ARE looking for lower 
cost alternatives to cable and DBS, but they are not willing to give 
up the NON-BROADCAST programming they have become addicted to. USDTV 
and On Digital failed because the content offering was too limited to 
justify the cost. Freeview has succeeded in part because of the 
improved channel line-up, but MOSTLY because it is FREE (after buying 
the receiver).


>No amount of AVC/H.264 migration hype was capable of changing that
>picture for USDTV, even though when constrained for spectrum, of course,
>you look for any help you can get.

One thing we have not mentioned is that the reason many of their 
installers had problems is that there is still a high percentage of 
homes where it is difficult to establish ATSC service. I know you 
will come back with glowing tales about the improvements in ATSC 
receivers, but the reality is that they deployed an earlier 
generation of receivers that did not work well in marginal areas.

If USDTV had deployed better receivers with built in PVRs they could 
have pushed more content to subscribers, which MIGHT have made a 
difference.

Too little... too late!

>
>And broadcasters do compete, for OTA audience. As evidenced by the very
>interesting new lineup Fox seems to be concocting for next season, just
>as a "for example." If Fox thought they didn't need to compete for the
>OTA audience, why don't they go back to EDTV and reduce power of their
>transmitters? (You know, behave more like UPN, still impossible for me
>to receive in OTA digital.)

Sure they do!

But this has nothing to do with the reason they rely upon cable. The 
OTA audience is composed of a small percentage of laggards such as 
yourself, and  a large percentage of bottom feeders who cannot afford 
a multi-channel service. But this audience is not sufficient to 
support the business. The congloms need the other 85% to be 
economically viable.

By maintaining the status quo they protect re-transmission consent 
and get the multi-channel service to handle the customer service and 
billing. Why compete when you can lean back and get a check from your 
competitors?

Regards
Craig
 
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at 
FreeLists.org 

- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: