Leave it to Barry Diller to state an obvious truth. The executive said the days of MVPDs extracting “pricing power” on advertisers and, to a lesser extent, consumers via ratings are over. And so is their growth. For years I have claimed that there is no such thing as "Free TV;" that we pay for ad supported programming at the check-out counter. For months, Bert and I have been arguing about the "fairness" of subscriber fees for content that we (well me and millions of MVPD subscribers) don't watch. The reality is that both of these forms of payment have much in common: - You may buy the products that are being advertised in any program you watch, but many other people do, and the cost of those ads is rolled into the price they pay. - You may not watch many of the channels that you pay for in a MVPD bundle, but millions of other viewers do. Like ad supported "free programming," everyone pays a little for everything, and the cost is strongly linked to the popularity of the program or network via ratings. It has been a nice ride for the content and distribution oligopolies, but Diller says the ride is over, and to some extent he may be right. Consumers are avoiding ads, and some are cutting the cord to avoid paying for the bundles of realtime streams, that are ALSO filled with ads. Diller is concerned because Amazon has come up with a new way to get people to pay for programs that have no ads, by buying stuff. Seems Barry is unaware that we have all been paying for TV by buying stuff, since Dinah Shore closed her show singing "see the USA in your Chevrolet..." The real problem is that the ads Diller loves are not very effective - the advertiser mostly for ad impressions on those who are unimpressed - or to be more accurate, uninterested in buying most of the stuff being advertised. And then there is the reality that most everyone would prefer to be entertained without the constant ad interruptions. So Amazon has put a new twist on an old idea. Free TV, without the ads, if you buy stuff from us. Diller has good reason to be concerned. Consumers are fed up with ad filled, appointment TV streams, especially for content that can be put on a server and viewed on demand. Live events are the last bastion of ad supported programming. It seems the tables are turned. Instead of cluttering our lives with ads that are largely ineffective, in hope that we may buy stuff, the future of TV may be driven by giving viewers content as a "reward" for actually buying stuff. Regards Craig Barry Diller: Pay-TV Program Margins 'Decimated' by Amazon Prime 15 Jan, 2015 By: Erik Gruenwedel With the pending rollout of four new original Prime Instant Video series, and Amazon trumpeting its collaboration with Woody Allen for the Oscar-winning director’s first TV show production, conventional wisdom would suggest the e-commerce behemoth is looking for the same thing multichannel video program distributors are: viewers. Not so, according to Barry Diller, former head of Paramount Pictures and now chairman of media company InterActiveCorp (IAC), who contends Amazon is merely using streaming video to lure and sustain Prime members more interested in e-commerce. To Diller, who financially backed recently shuttered Aereo TV, it’s no coincidence Amazon last month disclosed adding 10 million new Prime members during its 20th winter holiday retail period — underscoring the focus more on what consumers bought than watched. “Amazon is not doing [Prime Instant Video] to benefit advertisers. Essentially, the programing in this case is the advertising,” Diller told CNBC. In a sense, according to Diller, Prime Instant Video is a Trojan Horse that entices members with all-you-can-stream movies and TV shows, while subtly generating revenue and profit from myriad online purchases by millions of members eyeing free two-day shipping, among other perks. “If they sign up to Prime, they get a whole slew of things, some of which is fresh new video. That’s a [business] model no one has ever heard of,” Diller said. For multichannel video program distributors predisposed to generating and selling viewer ratings to advertisers, Amazon Prime is a business model they can’t compete against, according to Diller. Indeed, the executive said the days of MVPDs extracting “pricing power” on advertisers and, to a lesser extent, consumers via ratings are over. And so is their growth. “You’re not going to get the kind of [retransmission] increases programmers got, and if you’re a cable operator, your margins are being decimated on the programing side,” he said. Regards Craig