[opendtv] Re: And we were not even invited
- From: "Albert Manfredi" <bert22306@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 18:02:59 -0500
The problem is, it's a little late in coming. There was too much
semi-clueless
or completely clueless misinformation allowed to be divulged on ATSC from
way back, even by the ATSC itself.
I'm talking here about ideas like:
- ATSC is a point solution.
- ATSC is only meant for reception with 30 fit masts.
- ATSC can't do indoor reception.
- ATSC is only for big sticks, it can't do SFNs.
- ATSC can't do mobile reception.
- ATSC can't use other codecs.
- ATSC can't be used with hand-held appliances.
To any engineer who understands anything about layered protocols or digital
RF comms, every one of these much-repeated truisms was only perhaps true at
some point in time. It was not something that couldn't be resolved. So while
DVB went about solving whatever shortcomings they might have had, e.g. by
their after-the-fact development of DVB-H, the ATSC was made to appear
stagnant to the trade press, marketers, and to the politicos.
For example, DVB-H was much ballyhooed much before it was demonstrated.
A-VSB, by contrast, was a tightly held secret until it was demoed. So while
marketers went off assuming that DVB to hand-held appliances was a done
deal, they also went on assuming that ATSC would never be able to
participate. Bad idea to let these misconceptions become entrenched.
BTW, there is a parallel. Internet Protocols vs. ISO/OSI protocols. The
latter were very well written and very complete, more so than the IP ones.
But history showed that the IP were good enough and extensible enough that
the perfectly written ISO/OSI didn't matter so much after all.
I think that a more pro-active public attitude by the ATSC itself, vs.
always taking the initial position that these other capabilities had not
been established in the original standard (implication being that the new
capabilities couldn't be met), would have been a good thing. Maybe the
problem was the sting felt after 2nd gen receivers did not meet their
promise. I don't know.
Bert
_________________________________________________________________
Fixing up the home? Live Search can help
http://imagine-windowslive.com/search/kits/default.aspx?kit=improve&locale=en-US&source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=WLMTAG
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts:
