[openbeosstorage] Re: Device API: Implementation

  • From: "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeosstorage@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 14:32:25 CET (+0100)

> [SNIP-O-RAMA]
> > I will start with the core of the registrar side implementation -- 
> > i.e.
> > with classes to manage the data -- will then implement the basic
> > functionality of the user API, add notification support afterwards, 
> > and
> > finally get partitioning and FS initialization (the latter one as 
> > far
> > as possible) done.
> 
> That sounds like a good plan to me. I'm sorry I'm not really in a 
> position to be much help right at the moment...hopefully this will 
> change soon.

I'm looking forward to it. It's for a mysterious reason much more 
efficient to not work alone on something. ;-)

> Keep up the good work. :-)

Er, I'll try to. :-)

> I've realized that I need to revamp the session module yet again, as 
> audio sessions are now handled incorrectly. Argh. The good news is, I 
> think I'm finally starting to see the big picture of how things are 
> going to need to be handled overall. So, for the time being, I guess 
> I'm just going to focus on getting that module working properly.

Good deal.

> (thoroughly ecstatic to be using a version of Beam that now supports 
> People files :-)))

Hehe. Finally. :-)

CU, Ingo



Other related posts: