"Matthijs Hollemans" <matthijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The BSD stack is a proven one, I say we stick to it. > So why has OpenBeOS its own kernel? The BSD kernel is a proven one, > and > so is the Linux one. Still, there was reason enough not to use those > kernels and "roll our own" instead. The same could, and probably > does, > apply to the net stack. Since we have to be compatible with the BSD stack, this is a completely different situation, I would say. There is no kernel like the BeOS kernel out there yet, so we have to reimplement it for the most part, but there are tons of BSD stacks out there. BTW FreeBSD is often much more multi-thread aware than the other BSDs in my experience. Perhaps their networking stack is, too. Adios... Axel.