[openbeosnetteam] Re: Fw: [ge-talk]Networking futures
- From: "vladimir reikine" <vreikine@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeosnetteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:30:03 -0400
CIFS support is not the same as native distributed filesystem. Of course, we
need to have CIFS support.
Does native network filesystem assumes that OBOS will use it for paging ?
Especially, when we talk about diskless clients ?
And I'd like to get on GE list too :-)
--
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:27:52
Philippe Houdoin wrote:
>In reply to Emmanuel Jacobs:
>
>> FYI :-)
>
>Thanks.
>
>Most of these features can be added afterward as userland servers, apps, add-
>ons or a combinaison of that, I guess.
>
>But, what should be (or would be better if) placed into the stack itself?
>LDAP support? I'm not LDAP fluent myself, in what's it's can be considered
>similar to DHCP and/or DNS?
>
>For the native distributed file system, I agree, NFS4 is a good design.
>But I'll bet that for most users CIFS support (aka WON aka friend's Windows
>(or
>Samba served) shared resources accessibility) is a must have, even before a
>good full-featured network fs like NFS4.
>
>> If required, discussion can be continued on the GE mailinglist.
>
>Where can I search ge-talk archives? Or subscribe?
>
>-Philippe
>
>
____________________________________________________________
Get advanced SPAM filtering on Webmail or POP Mail ... Get Lycos Mail!
http://login.mail.lycos.com/r/referral?aid=27005
Other related posts:
