[nasional_list] [ppiindia] Does war on terror benefits only the military, or the nation?
- From: "Ambon" <sea@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@freelists.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:19:13 +0100
** Forum Nasional Indonesia PPI India Mailing List **
** Untuk bergabung dg Milis Nasional kunjungi:
** Situs Milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ **
** Beasiswa dalam negeri dan luar negeri S1 S2 S3 dan post-doctoral
scholarship, kunjungi
http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com
**http://www.thejakartapost.com/yesterdaydetail.asp?fileid=20060105.C03
Does war on terror benefits only the military, or the nation?
National News - January 05, 2006
Tiarma Siboro, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
Despite the precious little progress the Indonesian Military (TNI) has achieved
in the area of internal reform, it has does have something to be proud this
year: the lifting of the arms embargo by the United States.
The U.S. decision last November was linked to George W. Bush's global war on
terror. It came after President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono met Bush and ordered
the TNI to actively assist National Police in fighting terrorism.
It was clear however that the lifting of the 14-year embargo on arms sales to
Indonesia had nothing to do with the TNI's achievement in boosting its track
record in human rights issues.
Aside from that, some analysts believe the decision might have been a U.S. move
to prevent Indonesia from seeking military supplies from other countries,
especially Russia.
The arms ban was imposed in 1991 after TNI soldiers shot dead hundreds of
mourners in Timor Leste (formerly East Timor). It was extended due to human
rights violations linked to the military-backed militia rampage also in East
Timor after the 1999 autonomy plebiscite.
The involvement of soldiers in the national campaign against terror has raised
strong criticism from human rights activists and others, who said the
government should have instead further empowered the police to handle such
matters.
A retired police general says that "certain forces" within the military
institution have close ties with radical Muslim groups, including the Islam
Defender's Front (FPI) and Laskar Jihad.
"This fact is part of the reason why the government involved the military in
the domestic war to crack down on terrorist cells," he added.
Another reason was power. The government had been warned to be cautious in
attempting to strip power from the military, otherwise it could create social
disturbances in retaliation.
"We should not keep cornering the military because they will not stop playing
terror games until they can seize back power," said the police general.
President Susilo issued orders for the military to join the national terror war
in response to the second Bali attack on Oct. 1, 2005, which killed 23 people
including the three suicide bombers. The resort island had also been bombed on
Oct. 22, 2002, in which 202 people, mostly Western tourists, were killed.
Terror also rocked Jakarta when bombers attacked the Australian Embassy in 2004
and the J.W. Marriott Hotel in 2003.
The President didn't give clear guidance on how the military should deal with
terror threats, but TNI chief Gen. Endriartono Sutarto quickly responded to it
by saying he would reactivate the much-criticized military territorial role to
collect information from the community and to set up an early warning system
aimed at preventing more terrorist attacks.
According to Endriartono, the territorial role would give military intelligence
officers the ability to "infiltrate" communities where terrorist groups had
developed their networks.
Should that be the argument, why has the military been singularly unable to
stop violence in conflict-torn areas where it had established territorial
commands? In fact, the military has often been accused of actually being behind
or involved in communal clashes.
It is still fresh in many minds that the scrapping of the military's
territorial function was one of the strongest demands raised by the
pro-democracy movement in 1998, which was marked by the ousting of former
authoritarian president Soeharto.
Analysts and human rights campaigners say the revival of the territorial role
shows that the military has not been at all serious in undertaking its internal
reform programs.
During the Soeharto era, the military abused its socio-political function to
intimidate and subdue government critics, even kidnapping and murdering them.
Officially, this role was scrapped after Soeharto's fall, but in fact the
military remains politically very influential as evidenced by the victory of
many of its former officers in certain local direct elections.
Civilian and military intellectuals have repeatedly warned that civilian
incompetence could give the military an excuse to come back to the political
fore.
There seemed to be a little good news when the military allowed its generals to
be tried in a human rights tribunal for their roles in the 1999 carnage in East
Timor after it voted for independence from Indonesia.
The same court had also tried senior military officers on charges of serious
human rights violations in connection with the 1984 shooting incident in
Tanjung Priok, North Jakarta.
But the good news quickly evaporated when none of those tried were convicted of
any wrongdoing.
Also, all military officers were exonerated by a human rights court in
Makassar, South Sulawesi, from all charges resulting from the Abepura shooting
incident in Papua province.
Other progress seemed to be made by the TNI when it allowed civilians to design
national defense policy, allowed its seats in the House of Representatives to
be scrapped, and for some of its businesses to be taken over by the government.
However, with regard to these issues the military has been put to the test as
to whether it is really serious about bowing to civilian control, of abandoning
politics and of handing over all its businesses.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Clean water saves lives. Help make water safe for our children.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/CHhStB/VREMAA/E2hLAA/BRUplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:
1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi
4. Satu email perhari: ppiindia-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
5. No-email/web only: ppiindia-nomail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
6. kembali menerima email: ppiindia-normal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
ppiindia-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
** Forum Nasional Indonesia PPI India Mailing List **
** Untuk bergabung dg Milis Nasional kunjungi:
** Situs Milis: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ **
** Beasiswa dalam negeri dan luar negeri S1 S2 S3 dan post-doctoral
scholarship, kunjungi
http://informasi-beasiswa.blogspot.com **
Other related posts:
- » [nasional_list] [ppiindia] Does war on terror benefits only the military, or the nation?
