-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I've been aiming for that kind of thing for a long time, here is, for example, a proof of concept for Linux kernel: https://github.com/250bpm/linux-2.6/tree/sp-v2.6.36 - From the technical point of view, nanomsg has no dependencies, except for C runtime. Thus, when moving the code to the kernel you would have to emulate using user-space calls (e.g. socket API) from inside of the kernel. Not sure how easy is that in BSD kernel. In Linux kernel, at least, it's not entirely trivial. Martin On 04/09/14 00:27, Sideropoulos, Alexander wrote: > Hey all. I have posted this question to StackOverflow, but there is > little nanomsg traction on that site (for now). > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25576195/using-nanomsg-in-kernel-space > > I am essentially looking to get nanomsg working in kernel-space > (FreeBSD) with an end-goal of sending/receiving messages between > kernel and user threads. Any thoughts? > > Thanks! ---------- Alexander P. Sideropoulos NetApp -- Performance > Engineering siderop1@xxxxxxxxxx > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUB+sxAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YGLMH+gPnioxEYwOxJW1LQSFNx1D/ 6xHP2V0XelS7868yS1FhYhFbnAbq32aVcwxilETdB56RDy3xwYVY4vGIUpClijHf 5hslPGryykvP7QvjDVfGDkXuxTdjV0tUo5s9MvGQQIAu2Zcg7HkMkTHlEeuedn+K GjUFDdWBReJOHP+1tRa/ow+lGIdl/SnenpxV7P5gmQwWxHY+nzXvDwflh4JuC3aJ /WnO8truuSIHnPflkvXQT7K2OFY9Yj8jW4EzD3NNZprDYzUqde/4xncXRnwPzIlQ hoRVso4eGJZFVijW4xRqgMvNIs0kw+MZbTpaGPblf00mUhXEisp68bJAUbxjOXA= =SB7V -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----