[nanomsg] Re: UDP & TLS RFCs
- From: Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:22:22 -0700
One thing I'd wonder is if TCP/TLS/UDP are the right thing to key the
specification on - what actually seems to be _relevant_ is "SP over
transports with SOCK_STREAM semantics" and "SP over transports with
SOCK_DGRAM semantics" - that then covers TCP, TCP+TLS, AF_UNIX SOCK_STREAM
(IPC), IPC+TLS, UDP, UDP+DTLS, etc.
Martin Sustrik wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've added first drafts of UDP and TLS RFCs into the rfc subdirectory.
> Feel free to comment.
>
> Garrett, you'll probably want to make yourself the editor of the TLS
> draft. I don't have enough experience in the area to make a sane
> editor of that document.
>
> As for generating the txts from xmls I am at the moment using online
> xml.resource.org tool. Later on we can add xml2rfc to the build process.
>
> Also note that I've added the RFCs to the nanomsg package.
>
> Martin
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTL8uaAAoJENTpVjxCNN9Y7j4H/0mfcV8UsKuJuCzitWoM8puH
> RdQGvHJCaZCAlWcjogUQis+NTSEO5UlasCpqG9jsq57o0Rt5ZnDytvqHPDLfBXmB
> DsBghtDyufr3GC7L6G/EApQKCjn/+LfmHETiGUhAT2mUX0yGFulP4oc5RWbawzB0
> AGEL3OdZELonOSV4G9QcPskbUaatD4jjhEcjG76LqXE3TC58B30yKxIKZrFRla/S
> Zs9LMGAiBdMd8qJf5ymBsot0geu2Ej2K73P9/0pS9pa1roKcNLUOt0n8h/j4XdUz
> HsXwV0u4mmc7aw1xmP8p8mrMvGGgeHUaXmKAsXPGE5qJDwBhp2tbTPtS2rsXxj4=
> =xHyP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
