[nanomsg] Re: The nanocat utility
- From: Paul Colomiets <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:54:14 +0300
Hi Schmurfy,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Schmurfy <schmurfy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I really like the idea of such tool to help debugging although I think the
> simplest way of actually doing it is using on the bindings available and
> do it in higher level languages.
> One of the advantages of using ruby/python/... is that you easily manipulate
> the data.
Compare:
nanocat --sub --connect tcp://127.0.0.1:1234
with:
python -c 'import nn; s=nn.socket(nn.AF_SP, nn.NN_SUB);
s.connect("tcp://127.0.0.1:1245"); s.setsockopt(nn.SUBSCRIBE, b"");
print(s.recv())'
You may imagine loop for NN_REP.
You may also try to google for zmqcat, to find out how many users of
such an utility (and thats not counting zmqc, zc, pjutil, and other
more rare names)
--
Paul
Other related posts:
