[nanomsg] Re: The monitoring for nanomsg

  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 12:39:02 +0200

On 05/09/13 12:37, Paul Colomiets wrote:
Hi Martin,

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05/09/13 11:04, Schmurfy wrote:

When you say that admin and library api should be separated do you mean
having them provide two sets of apis or to have the library provide
hooks for the admin part and keep both projects separate ?


Given that the admin rarely sits inside of the application, I would say the
admin interface should be a protocol built on top of IPC or TCP.


Why not go a step further and build it on top of nanomsg?

Possibly. It's an implementation detail.

Martin


Other related posts: