[nanomsg] Re: The monitoring for nanomsg

  • From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 09:31:26 +0200

On 05/09/13 09:28, Paul Baxter wrote:


I think what's been described as part of a distributed management
capability is excellent, but I'm not sure it should be part of nanomsg
itself. Perhaps a nanomgr project :)

Perhaps nanomsg could provide some hooks to query queue sizes,
connection states, but from reading some past posts I got the
impression Martin wasn't so keen on providing these.


These should be definitely provided.
However the key is to keep user interface (the library API) and admin interface fully separate. 

Martin

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. nanomsg
  3. Archive
  4. 09-2013