[nanomsg] NN_SNDBUF on inproc
- From: Steve Vinoski <vinoski@xxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg <nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:42:06 -0400
I'm wondering why the inproc transport doesn't support NN_SNDBUF? Seems
like all the machinery to check the queue size and return EAGAIN if there's
no room is already in place, and so just wiring the setting of the
NN_SNDBUF option value into the already-existing variable, overwriting the
default 128k, would make it work.
I'm happy to go create a pull request for this, but wanted to check first
to make sure there's not some design decision I'm overlooking.
thanks,
--steve
Other related posts:
