[nanomsg] Re: Binding maintainers: Unused error codes
- From: Örjan Persson <o@xxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:08:52 -0700
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 27/08/13 17:26, Charles Remes wrote:
>>
>> I believe the whole point of the nn_symbol function was to allow for
>> binding authors working with dynamic languages to seamlessly support nanomsg
>> without requiring access to header files which could change between
>> releases. Secondly, the library is still alpha. There should be no concern
>> at all for backwards compatibility at this point.
>
>
> Yes. Just making sure that nobody will be hurt in the process in some
> obscure way.
I'll be a little hurt. Will recover and feel better in the long run
tho. Feel free to remove! ;)
Other related posts:
