...also, do you have any details from the makers/ratings plate on the alternator? Yours, Rich. On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, R.L. Roebuck wrote: > Hi there Peter, > > Can I ask - how are you acheiving motor control in all of this. Do you > have a PWM unit lined up such as 4QD supply, or are you thinking of using > a large resistance, or something else? > > Yours, > > > Rich. > > > On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Peter Sheppard wrote: > > > John, > > > > Thanks for that. > > > > I note the use of the diode, but shouldn't it be the +ive terminal to the > > battery ? (the pointy end!) > > > > With regard to the petrol/electric bit, my main concern is that when the > > motor > > is pulling serious current (it limits at 96A on 24v dc) then the alternator > > will try and fill that gap (or at least it will try until it current > > limits). > > > > I only have a 3/4 hp petrol engine driving the alternator, so I have visions > > that it may stall. The only thing I suppose is to try it. I have no idea > > what > > the maximum charge current of a 24v alternator is - any suggestions? > > > > Cheers > > > > Peter > > > > > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > To prevent any external voltage source damaging the alternator such as > > > regenerative braking you need a heavy current diode in the main alternator > > > output connected so that its normal output current is conducted but any > > > reverse current is inhibited. Just connect the diode +ve terminal to the > > > alternator and the negative terminal to the load. > > <snip> > > > This would be a standard sort of setup and will solve any problems of > > > overcharging and reverse current through the alternator. The charge will > > > also automatically increase to take up the load of the motor. > > > > > > John Rippengal. > > > > > > From: "Peter Sheppard" <peter.sheppard@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > Next phase. > > > > > > > > Last night I finally got the electrics in state that I could try it. > > > > > > > > Apart from the petrol engine not running properly (it ticks over OK but > > > > seems > > > > to suffer from fuel starvation at higher revs - it runs for a while then > > > > dies!) > > > > > > > > With the alternator field "off" the voltage was around 26.2 volts (one > > > > battery > > > > was in use on an electric locomotive over the weekend, so the volts may > > > > be > > > > down > > > > slightly). With the engine running and the field on (apart from slowing > > > > the > > > > petrol engine quite markedly - and this was with no load on the > > > > battery!) > > > > the > > > > battery volts rose to around 28v. > > > > > > > > So, it looks like the alternator works. > > > > > > > > So my question remains, what is better, weaken the field (which is > > > > intrusive to > > > > the alternator) and leave the engine running all the time, or leave the > > > > field > > > > as is and switch the charge to a dummy load whenever power is taken by > > > > the > > > > motor? I am still concerned by regenerative braking taking the volts up > > > > to 36 > > > > and damaging the alternator. > > > > > > > > I suspect it will depend on how much time the locomotive is running > > > > (i.e. > > > > hauling, not charging), versus sitting there idling (and thus charging). > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. > > > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, > > > modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject > > > line. > > > > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, > > modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject > > line. > > > > > > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.