Hi Bastien, I reduced the folowing exple to a few contigs in order to faciliate your tests and to be able to send it by e-mail, you should find in the archive 4 files : exple_out.caf, exple_6x.caf, new_out.caf and new_6x.caf From the initial de novo assembled 16 contigs and 162 reads (exple_out.caf), convert_project extracts 5 contigs and 105 reads with 6x coverage at least. Giving these 5 contigs as backbone to 43 new reads (including reads assembled in contigs with less than 6x coverage in first de novo assembly) in a mapping assembly, results in adding 41 reads to the assembly (new_out.caf), but when i use again convert_project, it results in only one contig beeing extracted (new_6x.caf). Hope this is clear, jorge. mira_talk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx a écrit sur 23/11/2009 22:33:31 : > On Montag 23 November 2009 Jorge.DUARTE@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > [...] > > Here is what happens in more details: > > [...] > > Eeeek? That does not look normal. > > Could you please put somewhere on a server > a) the first CAF (8051 contigs, 111k reads) > b) the second CAF (2451 contigs + the new 6k/7k mapped reads) > > I'll have a look at what happens. > > > Looking at the different caf files, i can't understand what makes these > > contigs selected compared to others, > > apart from the fact that the mapped reads increased their coverage by > > 6-fold, which makes me wonder where > > and how this information is stored in the caf format !?.. > > Coverage is not stored explicitly in the CAF, it must be recomputed by > convert_project when loading. > > Regards, > Bastien > > -- > You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the > mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or > unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html