On Oct 26, 2012, at 21:14 , Steven Sijmons <steven.sijmons@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > […] > When I then compared the number of reads in the fastq file I created with > convert_project, I noticed that these contained more reads than the number of > lines present in the debris_list. Debris_lists contained 232 628, 2 288 887 > and 42 826 127 reads, while the convert_project outputs contained 437 106, 2 > 392 084 and 43 632 082 reads respectively. Could these 'extra' reads be > causing this? And where are these reads coming from if they aren't in the > debris_list? Hoping that someone can give some possible explanations for > this, because I really don't understand what's happening here. Strange. convert_project should really only extract the reads it is told to fetch. Would you be able to provide the debris list and the original fastq for me to have a look? B. -- You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html