Hi, I think he meant another differnt kit (not minima) to build, least I read it that way. My variant... 11.2735mhz as I have a nice 8 pole 2.1 khz filter and both upper and lower sideband carrier crystals. Its not in close proximity of ham bands so that helps avoid a notch (still needed) that would hurt 30M or 20M. I have several radios for short wave listening so this is ham only. I'm using conventional DBMs, again I have them. IF will be CAS-B (I plan to have a minimal AGC) and on the other side of the filter will be a pair of J310 common gate (high threshold amp). The end signal side of the mixer will have a 2/3rds octave band pass filters (3-30mhz). that will be between the mixer and the antenna (plus preamp, switchable attenuator) for receive and in place for TX before the TX gain, TX will have low pass filters. The filters were needed to make the output clean enough and avoid out of band inputs (receive) that did cause spurs. Insertion loss was low under 3dB and some cases 1dB. I did a proto of highpass/lowpass filters using SMT parts and liked them for size and low coupling between components (inductors). If direction switching will be done with FST switches. The proto ran well with small sealed relays. and the ones used had better isolation. I may stick with relays. The interface to the Balanced-mod/product detector will be a circuit I worked out years ago using the same transistor as emitter follower on tx and common base on receive for a good match. Receive audio will be nothing exotic, likely all discrete. I'd like something with better distortion than lm386. Other built in circuits. Tx ALC, trivial circuit but I've used it on several radios and its effective. Cost is 1 transistor, a diode a few caps and resistors plus a zener (emitter base of a 2n3904 reversed biased). Its there to avoid hitting the power output peaks hard and avoiding splatter. Also provides a small amount of compression helping talk power. RX AGC takes a fet and two transistors, few diodes and caps. Goal is to keep the S8-S9 and above signals and keep them from overloading the product detector and my ears. For weak signals it will do little to nothing. This is far easier than trying to keep 20 millivolt down to a 1 microvolt signals at the same level and is rarely needed. Configuration will use a micro to do band switching based on tuned frequency and other minor things like running a si570 for the LO and frequency display. Mode (upper/lower, CW), power on, TXing, and a simple S-meter will be done with leds. My goals were simple radio, low RX power drain, 5W nominal, compact for portable use, with performance on receive on par with Elecraft K2 and TX cleaner than commercial rigs. NOTE: the K2 was the near top dog of the receiver specs game for many years before everyone realized they could do better. See Sherwood engineering web page on that. http://www.sherweng.com/table.html Allison On 02/18/2015 07:46 PM, farhanbox@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > robert it is unfortunate that people are kitting thr minima. in fact, > it is illegal as i have expressedly prohibited kitting until we are > ready with design that meets spectral purity of at least -40 dbc and > peferably -50 dbc. we are not at that point yet. > > this primarily due to the IF being inside the pass band. you could try > making it to just cover upto 14 mhz. the original circuit should work. > > - f > > ------ Original message------ > > *From: *Robert Toegel > > *Date: *Wed, 18 Feb 2015 23:42 > > *To: *minima@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:minima@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > > *Subject:*[minima] Re: Favorite Minima Modifications > > Haven't done anything yet. Just got a kit that somebody just started > to build. > > Bob > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Josiah Ritchie > <josiah.ritchie@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:josiah.ritchie@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > What are your favorite modification to the minima and why do you > like them? I'm playing around with it all right now and am > thinking about what I might to do make mine my own so it made me > curious. > > Thanks, > JSR/ > >