[mdmars_staff] Re: More from /E

  • From: J Sears <aat3ok@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Wayne <AAT3GI@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:21:27 -0800 (PST)

I agree,,, it was over looked and should not be again.  We need a standardized 
"CANNED" program that we use to draft that kind of OPORD.  That way nothing 
gets left out.
DC would have been our primary outlet if something actually had happened.

--- On Fri, 1/23/09, Wayne <AAT3GI@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Wayne <AAT3GI@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: More from /E
To: aat3ok@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, January 23, 2009, 6:31 PM

I was cc on this message from Bruce 3EVA to Larry 3RE nothing new but 
interesting and thought you should see it.

One of the 'escapes' in our Alert Notification communications (and NCS 
instructions) was the lack of explicit instructions to assign liaison 
station to local VHF repeaters. Due to the poor HF situation at MEMA, the 
VHF (DC Repeater) capability became an essential and heavily subscribed 
channel. I chose to enlist VHF liaisons as the initial NCS and that pattern 
was repeated by subsequent NCS' to good avail. Recommend we explicitly 
include VHF liaison in our planning.


Other related posts:

  • » [mdmars_staff] Re: More from /E - J Sears