[lit-ideas] Wikipedia
- From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 13:36:52 EDT
In recent weeks I note you academicians out there have been citing Wik.
pretty frequently. I haven't visited the site for months (perhaps it's
changed?)
and initially I liked the theoretical idea behind it, but the more I read,
the more I thought, "you know, Jo Shmo could be editing or writing this
article out of the pure fantasy of his head....". It seemed more to me like
gossip
than scholarship. Someone want to set me straight?
Julie Krueger
Other related posts:
