[lit-ideas] Re: Whiteheadiana

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:33:47 -0500 (EST)

In a message dated 1/27/2014 12:40:20 P.M.  Eastern Standard Time, 
omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Honestly, I think that  very few contemporary philosophers believe that 
their arguments possess the  certainty of 'demonstration' in the Aristotelian 
sense. (Other than perhaps in  the field of formal logic, to the extent that 
logic might still be considered a  branch of philosophy) It might be 
flogging a dead horse, here.   :)  

Well, it _might_ do to revise what Aristotle, in Greek, meant by 'proof',  
since we were citing him.
 
"In the same spirit, therefore, should each type of statement be received;  
for it is the mark of an educated man to look for precision in each class 
of  things just so far as the nature of the subject admits; it is  
[clearly/surely/plainly] equally foolish to accept probable reasoning from a  
mathematician and to demand from a rhetorician scientific proofs" [Nicomachean  
Ethics, I.1]
 
But, of course, we may yet have to learn what this interpreter of Whitehead 
 wants to explore regarding Whitehead on the topic: the creation of wild 
and free  concepts -- apparently.
 
I hope she explores the most obscure writings by Whitehead, since he _may_  
be a philosopher worth revisiting -- or not.
 
I would NOT think Whitehead was having Aristotle as his idea of logic; more 
 likely Frege, that Russell worshipped, or Peano. Vide, Kneale, "The 
development  of logic". 
 
O. K. raises an interesting point as to whether logic should be considered  
a branch of philosophy. The dichotomy in Whitehead seems to be mathematics 
vs.  philosophy, rather -- indeed.
 
When this interpreter of Whitehead speaks of 'mathematical necessity' or  
the 'necessity' of a mathematical proof, I guess we have to rewrite that in  
terms of mathematics _as Whitehead knew them_, rather than any later  
developments of the discipline. I should revise the references cited in this  
exegesis of Whitehead's work -- or not, of course.
 
Cheers,
 
Speranza
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: