Here's the NY Times editorial for today. Like everyone else, they recommend a cease-fire, which normally makes sense to help bring about a diplomatic resolution for the two sides. But what does Hezbollah want? It wants the destruction of Israel, the extinguishment of Israel, Israel annihilated from the face of the earth (as whathisname, the head of Iran has plainly said). Do you think "that promising long term solution, which enjoys International support" makes sense? Only if you don't recognize what Hezbollah and Iran are really after. The NYTimes continues... "That promising long-term solution, [ a cease-fire]which enjoys wide international support, will take time. No country has yet offered troops, nor has Hezbollah resigned itself to the idea that it will have to disarm, or at least remove its forces and weapons from the vicinity of the Israeli border. And once Lebanon's airport and seaports are again fully operational and the road to Damascus cleared, there will have to be some way of making sure that Syria and Iran do not resupply Hezbollah with long-range rockets capable of hitting Israel. But all alternative approaches pose even greater problems. Renewed Israeli airstrikes and intensified ground operations can offer no lasting solution unless Israel is prepared to undertake another lengthy occupation to prevent resupply and regrouping. The most optimistic Israeli commanders concede it would take at least 10 to 14 more days to locate and destroy Hezbollah's rockets and command post. The mounting civilian casualty toll that would accompany an Israeli offensive of that length would multiply the huge propaganda gains that Hezbollah, Syria and Iran have already reaped and multiply the damage to Israel and the United States. With the Security Council now preparing to act, Washington needs to call on Israel to accept an extended cease-fire while diplomacy proceeds." Where will diplomacy lead? Stan Spiegel Portland, ME The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments: Shortcut to: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/opinion/01tue1.html?_r=1&oref=slogin Note: To protect against computer viruses, e-mail programs may prevent sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your e-mail security settings to determine how attachments are handled.