[lit-ideas] The end https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSUIQgEVDM4
- From: Adriano Palma <Palma@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:54:58 +0000
Dear m. enns, converse, converse, as you aver your views allow, unfortunately
not all or not everyone or not one shares the fake rules invented by the
conversation itself to decide which move is which, not all, not everyone, and
not one buys this junk of the language game, not everyone, not all, and not one
think that everything is true
-----Original Message-----
From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Phil Enns
Sent: 27 February 2015 15:31
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [lit-ideas] The end of conversation
I am going meta. Apologies to all.
Mr. Palma wrote:
"Nobody who has an iq above 9 believes [this] junk, rorty?"
I object to how posts like the above put an end to conversations, some of which
I find interesting. There is nothing wrong with objecting, but there is
something uncivil about bringing conversations to a premature end. A thoroughly
Rortyian observation, but there you have it.
I find Kant, Heidegger and Rorty all very thought-provoking. I don't mind the
insults. But if a sustained conversation is impossible because of them, then
the good of this list is unclear for me.
<End of meta>
Phil Enns
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest
on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
N�!jx ʋ�.+Hu欱�m�x,���r��{�����iƭ����� }ؠz�h�� ~����0��ݭ��r��}���؝y�!�i
Other related posts:
