R. Paul quotes: >>That's the whole point, that they >>became Americans in their new >>home in which they planned to stay, >>rather than fantasizing about returning >>to the old country. Very true. One of my favourites is the baptismal certificate for "New London", Connecticut -- below. No "Take me back to dear old Blighty" nonsense about it). Cheers, JL ---- "Whereas it hath been a commendable practice of the inhabitants of all the colonies of these parts, that as this country hath its denomination from our dear native country of England, and hence is called New England; so the planters, in their first settling of new plantations, have given names to those plantations of some cities and towns of England, thereby intending to keep up and leave to posterity the memorial of several places of note there, as Boston, Hartford, Windsor, York, Ipswich, Braintree, Exeter. This court, considering, that there hath yet no place in any of the colonies, been named in memory of the city of London, there being a new plantation within this jurisdiction of Connecticut, settled upon the fair river Monhegin, in the Pequot country, it being an excellent harbour and a fit and convenient place for future trade, it being also the only place with the English of these parts have possessed by conquest, and that by a very just war, upon the great and warlike people, the Pequots, and therefore, they might thereby leave to posterity the memory of that renowned city of London, from whence we had our transportation, have thought fit, in honour of that famous city, to call the said plantation New London." (*) (*From E. V. Mitchell, "It's an Old New England Custom", Vanguard: -- Mitchell writes: "From the many mistakes which were made in naming towns, it might be concluded that the early legislators were indifferent to the matter, but the records show that they took the business seriously. They demurred when asked to legalize the name of New London, Connecticut, suggesting that the town be called Fair Harbor instead; but to this the inhabitants would not consent, preferring to adhere to the Indian name Pequot, or to one of the other aboriginal names which they had tried, if they could not have the one of their choice. Evidently it was thought that the New Londoners wanted to adopt the name of the great English metropolis as bait, or had delusions of expected grandeur; but at length they succeeded in convincing the authorities that their desire for the name was based on affection, not vainglory, and on March 24, 1658, the place was named New London. The act by which this was done constitutes so unusual a baptismal certificate that I quote it in full [above]." (p. 223). ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html