Earlier (last night?) I tried to email some amateur veterinary information to Erin Holder about her sick dog. I meant it to be a private post. However, I somehow sent it to the list. This listserv does not like my mail program and if I don't remember to send my posts in ASCII 'plain text' (not my mail program's default setting apparently), my posts appear as inscrutable nothings on the list. But, my slip turns out in this case to have been for the best, and those who found my contribution perplexing should take an even strain, as Captain Geary would say. They missed nothing. I'm glad to hear from Walter again, and look forward to having the steps from the fact that some dogs can understand some words to questions about responsibility for beliefs spelled out for beginners. As I remember, Walter believes beliefs are causes _and_ that to act on a belief that contradicts other beliefs one holds (and is aware of holding) is to act irrationally (a prima facie safe position). He also believes (I think) that one can never act for reasons one thinks are less than the best one has without, again, acting irrationally. I have the sinking feeling though that I haven't quite captured what it is that he believes about beliefs. But I'll bet he believes something. Robert Paul Reed College ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html