[lit-ideas] Re: Seamus Heaney dies

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:36:16 -0400 (EDT)

In a message dated 8/30/2013 7:28:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

>Seamus Heaney dies
 
and, may I add, before that, he had been born.
 
One interesting topic for discussion is ascription, self-ascription, and  
should we say, other-ascription.
 
From wiki:
 
"Heaney was named one of "Britain's top 300 intellectuals" by The Observer  
in 2011, though the newspaper later published a correction acknowledging 
that  "several individuals who would not claim to be British" had been 
featured, of  which Heaney was one."
 
To consider:
 
truth-conditional 'force' of:
 
i. Seamus Heaney is British.
ii. Seamus Heany is not British.
iii. Seamus Heany claims not to be British -- ('implicature': +> but he  is)
iv. [The Observer] Seamus Heany "would not claim to be British"  
(implicature: 'but he should')
v. other.
 
It's different with Geary not claiming to be non Memphian.
 
Or not
 
Cheers,
 
Speranza
 
 
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: