In a message dated 8/30/2013 7:28:32 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: >Seamus Heaney dies and, may I add, before that, he had been born. One interesting topic for discussion is ascription, self-ascription, and should we say, other-ascription. From wiki: "Heaney was named one of "Britain's top 300 intellectuals" by The Observer in 2011, though the newspaper later published a correction acknowledging that "several individuals who would not claim to be British" had been featured, of which Heaney was one." To consider: truth-conditional 'force' of: i. Seamus Heaney is British. ii. Seamus Heany is not British. iii. Seamus Heany claims not to be British -- ('implicature': +> but he is) iv. [The Observer] Seamus Heany "would not claim to be British" (implicature: 'but he should') v. other. It's different with Geary not claiming to be non Memphian. Or not Cheers, Speranza ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html