From an online source, an essay on the Paradigm Case Argument acknowledging Prof. R. M. Yost, Jr. -- Thought I'd share with Yost. Cheers, JLS The paradigm-case argument and 'possible doubt' * Author: Laurence D. Houlgate a Affiliation: a University of California, Los Angeles DOI: 10.1080/00201746208601359 Publication Frequency: 6 issues per year Published in: Inquiry, Volume 5, Issue 1 - 4 1962 , pages 318 - 324 Subject: Philosophy; This article is primarily a defense of the Paradigm-Case Argument (PCA). It is secondarily a comment on a recent controversy over the validity of its use in philosophy. I shall submit that the controversy rests on a misinterpretation. By extending the analysis of the objections (and here I shall invoke Descartes' famous method of 'possible doubt') I shall show that the occurrence of a paradigm and the fact that a concept is normally used to describe that paradigm logically entail not that the paradigm is instantiated, but only that it is correct to apply that concept to that paradigm. In this manner the ontological fallacy is avoided, and further, we have enforced the important separation between saying something about the correct application of a concept and saying something about its meaning. * I should like to acknowledge my indebtedness to Dr. Stanley Cavell, certain of whose remarks in lecture on the later philosophy of Wittgenstein inspired me to this article. None of these thoughts, however, should be attributed to him, nor is this to imply that he would agree to any part of the content. I am indebted also to a friend, Mr. William Forgie, without whose discussion these thoughts should never have been set down. Thanks also to Professors R. M. Yost, Jr. [...]" **************Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the web. Get the Radio Toolbar! (http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003) ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html