McEvoy: "Finding a swan 'verifies' the statement, not finding 'falsifies' it: but in neither case is the finding built on a bedrock and so, being possibly mistaken, neither the verification or falsification is logically conclusive. Thus our search and our findings are still forms of guesswork." --- This sounds strangely sceptical, but I think that's the best way to describe Popper, then. I see that wiki (scepticism) has an external link to an article on "a sceptical look at Popper" -- We have the Stoa, the Garden (Epicurus), The Academia, the Peripatos. Must we use the boring literal _sceptic_ (from Gk. verb meaning, 'to examine') for THIS school. Give me a metonymy anyday! Cheers, JL ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com