Män som hatar kvinnan. ----- Interestingly, to me, this is indeed, 'men who (some) hate 'queens'. 'quean' and 'queen' were indeed very neutral words in Old English. Surely they are not the feminine counterpart of 'king' at all. ----- I once had a discussion on the term 'quean' in English (as per J. R. Ackerley's bio -- cited in the OED) to mean 'homosexual'. Most people think that 'quean' (to mean 'homosexual') is related to 'queen'. Yet, 'quean' can be traced directly to 'FEMALE' without the 'ROYAL' predicate attached to it. So this is interesting to explain implicature, disimplicature, or explicature. I would think that 'quean' and 'queen' (indeed cognate with GUNE, in Greek, as in gynecology) were neutral FEMALE words. "Man" is interesting per se (as in Swedish 'maen', etc.). Alle-man, the Allemanic tribe, the German tribes -- are meant to be all-man, i.e. where MAN is indeed gender-neuter or gender-common. This was recognised in OE, where 'man' had to be qualified to serve its purpose. "weaponed man" (the weaponed man) was the 'MASCULINE' MAN, the one with the weapon, where 'weapon' was metaphor for 'penis'. O. T. O. H., the wyfman, or 'man' which is 'married' or wed to the weaponed man (?) was the 'wo-man'. Greer and other feminists of course later popularised the 'woman' as the WOMBan -- and even Michael Jackson played on this with HIStory tour -- and the time when people started speaking of HERstory. ----- I am ignorant if the wyfman vs. weaponed man has equivalent in Sweden, but it seems not: they are still using 'maen' to mean 'gender-neuter' MAN now NARROWLY implicaturally used to mean 'MASCULINE HUMAN BEING' and 'QUEAN' to mean what it meant in Indo-European, 'gune', FEMALE human being. Etc. J. L. Speranza The Swimming-Pool Library Buenos Aires, Argentina In a message dated 7/9/2009 3:21:31 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, teme17@xxxxxxxxx writes: Just saw Män som hatar kvinnan (Men who hate women). I am aware of the books, for some reason have been putting off reading them, so no comment on the adoption. It is one of the best films I've seen in a long time. It is not that is flawless, far from it, the characters are bit one dimensional, social commentary preachy, plot in many parts predictable and so on. But big screen films are supposed to be big, and this has got all, larger than life heroine and villain, a stoic hero, a complex evolving story building up from a missing girl to tale of corruption on national scale. The way Hollywood used to do movies, think Sam Spade as a troubled, pierced, poor, young hacker woman in modern sweden. And yet the characters manage to be interesting and touching, nothing about the film feels old fashioned (contra say otherwise fine Eastern Promises), and the graphic violence is necessary for the story and not overdone. Very impressed. ----- **************Dell Studio XPS Desktop: Save up to $400 - Limited Time Offer (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222466512x1201463496/aol?redir=htt p:%2F%2Faltfarm.mediaplex.com%2Fad%2Fck%2F12309%2D81939%2D1629%2D3) ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html