J. L., Bolano has a huge long list of Chilean poets in his Distant Star which I finished this morning - longer than your list of philosophers - everyone in Chile must be a poet. Not everyone wants to publish so he counts unpublished poets as well. They belong to Poetry reading groups, clubs and seminars and they are all happy to read their poems to you. They read their poems out loud and are jealous of the good poets and the handsome ones whom the girls are attracted to. According to the writing on the back, this novel was considered great. I'll have to read some reviews now to see what others thought of it. Coming out of a Negative/Positive consideration I was conscious of Bolano dealing with a lot of negativity, but he does it so engagingly and entertainingly that I forgave him. But I haven't forgiven Alejandro Jodorowsky. I just finished watching his El Topo. It is apparently considered a Mexican Cult Classic - maybe not only Mexican, I don't know. It was introduced back in 1970 by John Lenon who said this was his favorite movie. It was considered a "midnight movie," perhaps because it was so bizarre and outrageous that normal people wouldn't want to be exposed to it - so it was only shown at midnight when just the abnormal people were awake. But times change, perhaps more people are abnormal now. Maybe they're in the majority. Anyway, the movie was released on DVD last May. I decided to watch it last night because I am apparently in a mood for Latin American artistry. However after 15 or 20 minutes of it I shut it off and resolved to smash the DVD to bits and throw it away, but then caution had me set it aside for awhile. Then after finishing Bolano's novel I checked Wikipedia and read the following: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Topo This article outlines the entire movie. I was encouraged that some people took it seriously; so I watched the rest of it and then read the rest of the Wikipedia article. My considered opinion after watching the movie and now that I am once again calm is that Jodorowsky and Wieder (Bolano's serial killer) would like each other. Lawrence From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 4:51 PM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] The heyday of Oxford philosophy By "heyday of Oxford philosophy" I am merely IMPLICATING that what passes for philosophy in Oxford today can be described as it once was, as "Oxford philosophy", and it may just as well... Note too that Grice qualifies this as "the heyday of [Oxford] ordinary-language philosophy" R. Paul: "Out of this whole lot of 'Oxford philosophers,' I knew Paul Grice best." -- I'm never sure if it's heyday or hayday, so bear with me -- or correct as you wish. I'm trying from memory to make an alphabetic list of Oxford philosophers more or less of Grice's generation (born 1913, d. 1978). So we can discuss the shape of the noses, etc. of those who we may have known or otherwise: AUSTIN, John Langshaw (1911-) born Lancaster -- Lit. Hum. BA, MA Oxon HAMPSHIRE, Stuart Newton (b. 1919-)Married to Nancy Cartwright. born Lincolnshire. All Souls Graduate College. HARE, Richard Mervyn (b. 1919) born Devonshire. White's professor Moral. GARDINER, Patrick cited by Grice as member of the playgroup. NOWELL-SMITH, Peter Horace born London? Trinity -- next to Grice's St. John's PEARS, David Francis born London. -- collaborator with Grice. RYLE, Gilbert (born Brighton, Sx, 1900) Magdalen Coll, and Waynflete STRAWSON, Peter Frederick (1919-) born Dulwich, London. University Coll, and Waynflete THOMSON, James F. collaborator with Grice Born London? 1911? Married to Judith Jarvis Christ Church -- but early emigre to MIT, c. 1963 URMSON, James Opie (Corpus Christi) (b. 1913-) born Harrogate, Yorks WARNOCK, Geoffrey James (b. 1921) born Leeds, Yorkshire. Hertford and Vice-Chancellor WOOD, Oscar P. (Hertford College) cited by Grice, but of a previous generation. -- and that must be it! Grice made a special point about the Playgroup (that would meet on Saturday mornings -- This was organized by Austin, and none senior was accepted. Upon Austin's death, G. E. L. Owen said the coordination of the group was left to Grice, from 1960 till his departure for UC/Berkeley. But Grice had other duties, too as University Lecturer and tutorial fellow. The list of his students is immense, so it seems he hardly had a free day for leisure at his favourite pubs in St. Giles's Street: The Bird and the Baby, and the Lamb and Flag. It was in his American 'season' that he befriended quite a few more: Baker (although they had possibly met in Oxford), Myro, Warner, and most of the faculty at UC/Berkeley and surrounding area (Reed notably). I once had compiled a list of all the places where he was visiting lecturer. The man seems to have travelled quite a bit, but that's American philosophy for you (compared to the more parochiality of the Oxonian scene) I once also compiled a list of philosophers cited by Grice, and they included that one recently cited by McEvoy, J. L. Mackie (born New Zealand). Grice discussed Mackie and Foot in "Conception of Value". Back to Ryle, and G. E. L. Owen (his obit. of Ryle in Proc. Arist. Soc.), Owen writes that there were these two cliqued groups: The Ryle Group (Wood, Ryle, Owen, Woozley) and the Austin group (Grice, etc.). Owen goes on to say that there was more of a 'sanctity' if that's the word around the Austin group. I once detected something of what we could call the early playgroup -- that would meet at All Souls before the war -- Austin, Berlin, Hampshire, Ayer. But I now have evidence that, against what I believed, Grice never attended the Thursday night meetings of this 'playgroup'. He was apparently considered to have been 'born on the wrong side of the tracks' to attend. Stuff and nonsense, but true. Having been to Oxford, I feel the fascination, but also the disorganization of it all, and I cannot really imagine how things were in the hayday of Oxford linguistic philosophy. I imagine they were very closed, and as R. Paul, quite a barrier between those who were the 'heroes' and had fought in the 'Phoney War' and were full-time tutorial fellows, and the "Colonials", or Scholarship, or other visitors. Then they had the academic duties, as when Grice invited Bergmann, but he said he could not think of wasting an afternoon with some English futilitarians. Quine was also a guest of Grice at St. John's, but the ungrateful philosopher from Akron Ohio, criticises the negligence that he perceived in Grice. In general, they must have had some merry good old time. Apparently the seminar lectures that Grice gave in collaboration were especially fun (with Strawson, on Categoriae and De Intepretatione, also with Austin, Warnock, on phil. perception, and a few others). In these University Lecture open classes they apparently _ignored_ the audience completely. Quine witnessed a few of these meetings (It was when Grice/Strawson had come up with their "Defense of a dogma" in attack of Quine) and thought them so parochial and 'gentlemanly' in an old-fashioned way ("Now, Mr. Strawson recalls my comment on our previous meeting, and he describes my ... as...") that he found worth sharing. We must remind that Quine's background was mainly mathematical. His degree is in Mathematics and only later started to join the Philosophical club at Harvard. Grice was apparently popular in the East Coast -- where he delivered at least one lecture at Wellesey, and he would find affinity with philosophers at Princeton (Harman) and most places where philosophy was being _mentioned_. His love was this love of wisdom -- and at least he helped one Argentina put a human face (other than Socrates's ungainly one) to what this Argentine also loves. Cheers, J. L. Speranza President of "The Grice Club" (River-Plate chapter) etc. Buenos Aires, Argentina snail-mail to La Pampa, Calle 58, No. 611 La Plata B1900BPY Buenos Aires, Argentina heyday, Also 6 hayday, 8 hay day. [Of uncertain origin; perh. connected with prec. The second element does not seem to have been the word day The stage or period when excited feeling is at its height; the height, zenith, or acme of anything which excites the feelings; the flush or full bloom, or stage of fullest vigour, of youth, enjoyment, prosperity, or the like. Often associated with day, and taken as the most flourishing or exalted time. 1751 SMOLLETT Per. Pic. (1779) II. lxviii. 221 Our imperious youth..was now in the heyday of his blood. _____ See what's new at AOL.com <http://www.aol.com?NCID=AOLCMP00300000001170> and Make AOL Your <http://www.aol.com/mksplash.adp?NCID=AOLCMP00300000001169> Homepage.