Which of these two do you prefer ?
Heidegger: Why is there something instead of nothing ? Seeing that I am
obviously nothing - I cheat on my wife and I lick Nazi asses on daily basis
- how can there be something ? It is illogical. There must be nothing.
Wittgenstein: The limits of my retarded brain and of my stammering English
are the limits of the Universe. If there is any word that I do not
understand or cannot pronounce properly, it is meaningless. Let me draw you
a cave picture instead, there is a stone but I call it a fact.