[lit-ideas] Re: Grice's Infinity, Popper's Infinity
- From: Donal McEvoy <donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 08:45:11 +0100 (BST)
My previous reply shows a difference between humans and computers: aiming to
italicise some words I pressed 'send' instead of the italicize icon. Another
difference is that failure in my action gave rise to immediate
error-recognition operating at a W2 level and using W3 content as its basis.
Now I need to look at what I sent to see how far it is deficient because sent
prematurely - again something involving W2-W3 understanding that goes beyond
what a W1 computer could ever do.
Donal
________________________________
From: "Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx" <Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, 8 June 2013, 3:49
Subject: [lit-ideas] Grice's Infinity, Popper's Infinity
McEvoy is considering Euclid's Theorem in Popperian terms.
Then there's this link:
http://www.cs.joensuu.fi/~whamalai/skc/popper.html
that uses some interesting abbreviations that McEvoy may find useful.
Other related posts:
