Not much. Note that "Grice on Darwin" has to be understood as "what Grice said on Darwin", rather than having "on" DIRECTLY applied to both (Grice and Darwin). A natural consequence of this implicatural reading is made obvious by the fact that while Grice is on Darwin ENTAILS Darwin is under Grice it would be odd to read "Darwin under Grice" as the subject-line of stuff (as opposed to "Darwin under Grice's Consideration"). Grice wrote briefly (unlike Popper) on Darwin. On an airline sick bag (now in The Grice Collection, Bancroft Library), Grice wrote during a flight from Berkeley to Oxford: "Must read Chimp Literature" -- and right he was for he had found that an education at Clifton and Oxford (Corpus Christi, major in classics) had left him rather wanting to _learn_ more about 'stuff' ("Only the poor learn at Oxford"). In general, the word 'learn' is misused: The Toad, having finished his breakfast, picked up a stout stick and swung it vigorously, belabouring imaginary animals. `I'll learn 'em to steal my house!' he cried. `I'll learn 'em, I'll learn 'em!' `Don't say "learn 'em," Toad,' said the Rat, greatly shocked. `It's not good English.' `What are you always nagging at Toad for?' inquired the Badger, rather peevishly. `What's the matter with his English? It's the same what I use myself, and if it's good enough for me, it ought to be good enough for you!' `I'm very sorry,' said the Rat humbly. `Only I THINK it ought to be "teach 'em," not "learn 'em."' `But we don't WANT to teach 'em,' replied the Badger. `We want to LEARN 'em--learn 'em, learn 'em! And what's more, we're going to DO it, too!' `Oh, very well, have it your own way,' said the Rat. He was getting rather muddled about it himself, and presently he retired into a corner, where he could be heard muttering, `Learn 'em, teach 'em, teach 'em, learn 'em!' till the Badger told him rather sharply to leave off. Cheers, Speranza --- Subj: Talk: Lennox on Darwin (Oslo) James G. Lennox, «The Inductive Origins of Darwin's Origin» Place: Oslo, Blindern, Vilhelm Bjerknes hus, Aud. 4 Time: Friday 31. May, 18.00 It is an unfortunate fact that Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection is typically discussed either as a speculative leap of genius or as the inevitable product of various sorts of religious, political, scientific and philosophical influences on him. In this lecture I will present Darwin’s discoveries in a very different light, as the product of Darwin constantly asking questions and pursuing long and complex chain of inductive reasoning in which his ability to integrate apparently unrelated abstractions —“large classes of facts” as he sometimes refers to them in On the Origin of Species—plays the key role. To explore these aspects of Darwin’s research I rely on the large mass of unpublished notes, notebooks and correspondence (now available online) for it is here that one sees Darwin’s uncommon powers of inductive reasoning at work. James G. Lennox is professor of history and philosophy of science at the University of Pittsburgh. He is author of Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology (2001) and Aristotle on the Parts of Animals I–IV (2001) and coeditor of Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology (1987), Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences (1995), Being, Nature and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf (2010) and Metaethics, Egoism and Virtue: Studies in Ayn Rand’s Normative Theory (2011). Currently he is working on a book on Aristotle’s norms of inquiry and collaborating on a translation and commentary of Aristotle’s Meteorology IV. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html