[lit-ideas] Re: Further to Economics Not
- From: Judith Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:47:41 +0100 (BST)
Yes, I know exactly what you mean. With should be lower case, though. I
decided to check. It's Cider with Rosie.
Wikipedia has some stuff about all this but it sent me to sleep. Still, here it
is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalization#Titles
--- On Fri, 30/9/11, Andy <mimi.erva@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Andy <mimi.erva@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Further to Economics Not
To: "lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, 30 September, 2011, 13:30
Thank you. The convention part is what makes it so hard. Words like 'with' I
don't usually capitalize but am never sure. It'd be nice if there was a rule,
but then Republicans would lobby against it anyway so what's the point.
Andy
Happy there's no money to be made on the word 'with'
From: Judith Evans <judithevans001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 8:12 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Further to Economics Not
No. It's A Theory of Justice, Dombey and Sun, The Night of the Iguana, and so
on.
It's just a convention, though... .
Judy Evans, Cardiff
Other related posts:
