Hello, list!
There seems to be an issue when using the noletsignafter opcode. For
grade 1 contraction in the Norwegian language, we are using it to
prevent single letters in lists to be preceded by the legsign, e.g. dot
56.
The problem is that using 'noletsignafter .', the following string is
being misinterpreted:
1,7f.15
the number 7 after the comma is omitted in the output result.
When trying to debug the issue with lou_trace, the noletsignafter opcode
is not mentioned, so that the steps is the same with and without the
'noletsignafter .' present in the table.
Could someone please look into this problem?
Thanks and regards, and a happy new year to you all!
Lars
For a description of the software, to download it and links to
project pages go to http://liblouis.org
