Hello John,I think your idea of having a page to explain a little about the license and usage is a good idea. While it is common sense to actually read the licenses for full details, may be just have something at the bottom of the page saying something like "For full details of the licenses then visit" and have some links to copies of the licenses.
Michael Whapples On 07/10/09 19:22, John J. Boyer wrote:
The other John agrees. Unless there are further objections, I think Christian should go ahead. The draft of a licensing and use notice which I posted on Monday is intended to allay the fears which some people might have about the LGPL and GPL. Does anyone have comments on that? Thanks, John On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:09:18AM -0700, John Gardner wrote:Perhaps there is no legal need, but the two John's do appreciate being asked, as do all other members of this list I hope. Mostly we want to be sure that liblouis remains as useful as possible to all potential users. If having some tools as GPL excludes any users, we should all work together to find a better way. So let me make a final call to ask whether GPL licenses on the tools listed by Christian will make liblouis unusable by anybody. If not, then I interpret this to mean that we all concur that he should go ahead and do it. If some unforeseen problem arises later, we always retain the option of separating the GPL-licensed tools from the liblouis repository and provide a link to those GPL items for those who want them. John Gardner On 10/7/2009 4:45 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:Hello, Christian Egli, le Wed 07 Oct 2009 11:38:12 +0200, a écrit :On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 10:12 -0500, John J. Boyer wrote:I agree in general. Despite my dislike of the GPL I think it is phobably the best way to go for the tools and xml2brl now.Am I correct in my assumption that this means that the copyright holders, i.e. the two Johns agree to change the license of the tools to GPL?As I already said in a previous post, while it's a good idea to ask them, there is no strict need to: by licensing their work under LGPL, they already allowed any relicensing into GPL, see term 3. of the license. Samuel For a description of the software and to download it go to http://www.jjb-software.com-- ________________________________ John Gardner | President | ViewPlus 541.754.4002 x 220 | www.viewplus.com ________________________________ PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: This message and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited; please notify the sender and delete the message. ViewPlus Technologies, Inc. accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from this email. For a description of the software and to download it go to http://www.jjb-software.com
For a description of the software and to download it go to http://www.jjb-software.com