[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Capsnocont apparently doesn't do any thing was : 8 dots contracted with caps

  • From: Bert Frees <bertfrees@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:02:36 +0100

Hi Bue,

Haven't investigated it deeply, but it seems that you're right. Lars has
also noticed it some time ago (January last year).

I don't know when this regression happened. It is a feature that is used
very little (only in Danish and German) and apparently it has no tests at
all.


Bert


2017-01-16 21:04 GMT+01:00 Bue Vester-Andersen <bue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Hi Bert,



I have just tested capsnocont with the attached table:



Text: foo bar foobar

Expected: f b fb

Tests ok



Text: Foo Bar Foobar

Expected: ,f ,b ,fb

Tests ok



Text: FOO BAR FOOBAR

Expected: ,,foo ,,bar ,,foobar

Actual: ,,f ,,b ,,fb



As far as I can see, capsnocont makes no difference at all.



Or have I misunderstood something?



Bue



Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. liblouis-liblouisxml
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2017