[liblouis-liblouisxml] Re: Capsnocont apparently doesn't do any thing was : 8 dots contracted with caps

  • From: Lars Bjørndal <lars@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: liblouis-liblouisxml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 21:14:12 +0100

Hi, Bert!

You wrote:

Haven't investigated it deeply, but it seems that you're right. Lars
has also noticed it some time ago (January last year).
I don't know when this regression happened. It is a feature that is
used very little (only in Danish and German) and apparently it has no
tests at all.

I think I provided a test. We need the feature also in Norway. I.ve
attached the test again, to this mail.

Thanks and regards, Lars


2017-01-16 21:04 GMT+01:00 Bue Vester-Andersen
<[1]bue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Hi Bert,


I have just tested capsnocont with the attached table:


Text: foo bar foobar

Expected: f b fb

Tests ok


Text: Foo Bar Foobar

Expected: ,f ,b ,fb

Tests ok


Text: FOO BAR FOOBAR

Expected: ,,foo ,,bar ,,foobar

Actual: ,,f ,,b ,,fb


As far as I can see, capsnocont makes no difference at all.


Or have I misunderstood something?


Bue

References

1. mailto:bue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
tables: [unicode.dis, no-no-g1.ctb]
tests:
- [UNDER et, ⠠⠠⠥⠝⠙⠑⠗ ⠬, {xfail: true}]

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. liblouis-liblouisxml
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2017