[LRflex] Re: Why a R10? a mere FF Pana G would satisfy me
- From: pwerner <pwerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:22:29 +0100
I agree inasfar the camera should be able to meter wide open and have a DOF
preview button, but for that you do not need a DSLR. My main point is the
viewfinder. It is much easier and cheaper to build a G1-viewer type camera
than a new full-frame DSLR. Keep it simple. Of course it should cost much
less than an M9.
BTW, the petition has now reached 290
Cheers
Peter
----------------original message-----------------
From: "Walter Kramer" walter.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:54:19 +1100
-------------------------------------------------
> I tend to agree, however a compatible reflex mount would be more
> enabling for existing R glass. One would have the same program modes
> available as on the R7, (Sorry, no experience with later Rs) i.e, the
> camera would be able to meter wide open and then take the shot in
> program mode adjusting aperture and shutter speed according to the
> tendency the photographer has set. The G1 is fine but it will only
> determine shutter speed and full manual mode is also quite awkward.
>
> I have added my name to the petition. A full frame G1 type of camera is
> a step forward and it would be nice to mount R glass on it but I would
> not expect to pay M9 prices for it.
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
