Thanks to all who responded. Looks like I'll be keeping the negative. I'll be stoked if it sells though. Walter Sonny Carter wrote: > Unless one is very famous already, I cannot fathom why a limited edition > would make your prints more valuable. > Perhaps you are very famous, but I wasn't aware of that. > > I was just looking at some 1940-50's photography for sale here in New > Orleans yesterday, and though some prints were obviously from scanned > negatives, and newly printed by modern means, they had other prints from the > negatives priced much higher. These were still making revenue for the > photographer's family. > > I'm not so sure how well the "real" prints do against the others, but, once > you cut up the negative, that's it for "original prints." You just have to > ask yourself if you are famous enough or productive enough to limit your > editions. > > I imagine that among photographers who sell prints there are some shots that > sell over and over, despite the number sold, despite the price. "Moon > over..." comes to mind. You can buy a print of that shot today in "A > Gallery for Fine Photography," just ten blocks from where I sit. I forgot > his asking price, but hey, No one cut up that negative, Thank God. > > -- Walter Krämer walter.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxx walter.kramer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Bus: 03 9854 2463 Mob: 0414 884 965 ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/