mine does that too - no real issue so far even with the MD on amitiés Philippe Le 21 févr. 12 à 17:36, Miha Golobic a écrit : > I'm using Ilford and Kodak film so no issue there I guess. > Miha > > > > 2012/2/21 Richard Ward <ilovaussiesheps@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> I've just had a thought come to me about stiff film advances: >> Have you ruled out it being an artifact created by the FILM itself? >> >> ie: oddball film that is stiff -or- film with out of spec sprocket >> holes >> -or- old film fighting flattening out >> >> These all seem to be problems I've encountered at one time or another >> which made film advance feel funny and which I ultimately traced >> back to >> being the source of it. >> >> Hope it helps >> >> Richard >> >> _____________________________________ >> >> My Sarcasm Fu Is Strong, >> Proceed With Caution. :-) >> _____________________________________ >> >> On Feb 21, 2012, at 9:26 AM, Miha Golobic <miha.golobic@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> Maybe you are right, Richard. Although there only was one response >>> describing the film advance. >>> With the MD attached, the speed is the same with and without film. >>> And >>> since I prefer >>> to use the camera that way to shorten the shutter lag (or at least >>> I like >>> to think so), I doubt I'll send the camera away >>> to be checked. I will see. >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Miha >> ------ >> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: >> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ >> Archives are at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ >> > > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/