[LRflex] Re: R lenses on Nikon
- From: "Aram Langhans" <leica_r8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:12:02 -0800
You are probably right, Steve, but I think I will hang in there a bit longer
just to see what the R10 actually flushes out to be. I will putter along
with my Canon, which is even more of a PITA than the Nikon would be due to
the exposure problems. Most of what I shoot is static so I can take my time
(as much as my wife can stand) and go through the ritual. If I need faster
performance, I just put on my Sigma 17-70 which is really a pretty good
performer for what it cost. It was a great deal better than the POC lens
that came with the camera, or even the USM Canon lenses according what I
have read. I am sure L glass is better, but that was not my purpose in
buying the camera.
Aram
> -----Original Message-----
> From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:leicareflex-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Barbour
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:00 AM
> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: R lenses on Nikon
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Frank Filippone wrote:
>
> the R10 if/when ever available will be expensive......too much for me,
>
> I do have R lenses...so along with Nikkor glass, the D700 is the best
> realistic option,
>
> many thanks Frank,
>
> Steve
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.18/1936 - Release Date: 2/5/2009
11:34 AM
Other related posts:
